Make sure you agree with Council’s plans
for Newport for the next 20 years!
Draft LSPS document titled ‘Towards 2040’ now on exhibition with submissions closing on 10th November 2019.
Have your say at (click here or the below link)
Towards 2040 – Local Strategic Planning Statement (draft)
The NRA has made a submission but it is important for as many ratepayers to have a say. This document sets out the planning priorities for the total council LGA and will affect us here in Newport accordingly.
We have a number of concerns with this document and encourage as many people as possible to go on-line to the ‘Have Your Say’ at the above link. Our concerns include;
- Believe the comments re Spot Rezonings needs more emphasis so that it is clear council is strongly against allowing them.
- The forecast expansion of Marinas in Pittwater has to ensure there is no net increase after (i.e. have to swap equal number of swing moorings at equivalent length).
- The draft document does not address or mention AIR QUALITY – this should occur and set out the goals for improvement.
- This draft document supports an extension of the B-LINE to NEWPORT ???? – where did this come from and after all the efforts of the Newport residents.
- The draft also supports the introduction of a BRT (Bus Rapid Transport) system to replace the B-Line – all the way to Newport. A BRT requires a dedicated 24 hour bus lane which means there would be no parking on Barrenjoey Rd, destroying the village atmosphere and all the businesses in Newport – you have to question who dreams up these ideas?
- We need a controlled sustainable tourism industry which takes into account the environment, needs proper infrastructure etc.
***********************
Below we outline the planning process proposed for the total Northern Beaches Council.
We have concerns that in the development of the LEP through the Local Strategic Planning Statements that relevant Character Statements may not adequately maintain the true character requirements of the Pittwater community. Originally the State Planning Act following the council amalgamations (and following concerns raised by the forced amalgamated councils) allowed for an LSPS to be prepared for each of the five wards. Council did not elect to take up this opportunity and decided to only have one LSPS for the whole NBC.
We were advised that the NBC view was that it was not practical to put the Character Statements in the LSPS due to the vast number that maybe required and the limited size that was required/suggested under the legislation.
Following a meeting with NBC Planning executive on the 29th April we were advised that the NBC view was that the Character Statements should be an addendum to the LEP and in doing so this way would give greater legal status to the Character Statement giving them the same standing as the LEP itself.
Director of planning,Louise Kerr, said she thought that few developers would look at the LSPS anyway, so the LEP attachment/addendum was a better way to go.
NBC had requested an extension of time for completion of the LSPS.
In developing the LSPS NBC had to take into account the whole LGA, the District housing targets, the housing strategies (where and what was suitable for that location) and population targets. NBC had commissioned a number of expert studies in these areas which they were awaiting on.
For completion the LSPS had to go through a Gateway Process
******************
The planning system in 2019
The process
Regional and District plans for Sydney are created by the Greater Sydney Commission. See https://www.greater.sydney/metropolis-of-three-cities and https://www.greater.sydney/district-plans
Local Strategic Planning Statement (LSPS)
The LSPS is a new document required of all local councils by the NSW Government. Councils are required to exhibit their draft statement by 1 July 2019 and have their final version in place by 1 December 2019. “The LSPS should not simply repeat all the actions from a region/district plan, but present council’s priorities and give guidance to the LEP.” [NSW Dept of Planning] The LSPS will provide more certainty about councils’ future land use intentions. This will reduce the likelihood of a planning proposal that is inconsistent with an endorsed LSPS being supported by council or recommended for gateway determination. NBC has now released an online survey on its LSPS. https://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/-/media/Files/DPE/Factsheets-and-faqs/faqs-local-strategic-planning-statements-2018-09.pdf?la=en
Local Environment Plan (LEP)
“Local Environmental Plans (LEPs) guide planning decisions for local government areas. They do this through zoning and development controls, which provide a framework for the way land can be used. LEPs are the main planning tool to shape the future of communities and also ensure local development is done appropriately.” [NSW Dept of Planning] Currently the Northern Beaches Local Government Area (LGA) has 3 LEPs – one each for Manly, Warringah & Pittwater. These 3 must be merged into one LEP. This process will have a critical effect on future planning & development decisions in Pittwater.
Development Control Plans (DCPs)
“While the rules set out in the LEP are most important, more detailed design and planning requirements are provided in DCPs. Here you will find information in simple language, with diagrams and pictures on issues including: Building design, siting and size; Access to sunlight; View sharing; Landscaping; Car parking; Heritage; Stormwater treatment; Waste management; & Fences and walls.
DCPs provide guidance only, which means there can be flexibility to make variations when supported by a good argument in a Development Applications (DAs).” [NSW Dept of Planning] Obviously any variation will need to take into account the LEP.
Integrating local character considerations in planning .
A Local Character Statement (LCS)
The LCS is an optional, standalone document that a council could produce comprising a description of an area’s existing character and detailing its desired future character. It is a place to describe a community’s preferences for how an area could change while retaining its unique character. These statements could be implemented through introducing a local character overlay and associated standard instrument clause within the LEP.” [NSW Dept of Planning, Local & Place Guideline] https://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/-/media/Files/DPE/Guidelines/Local-character-and-place-guideline-2019-02-26.pdf “We expect Councils will work with us and prominently feature Local Character Statements in every new rezoning from now on. They’re going to become a critically important feature of planning that puts communities at the centre of everything we do.” [former Planning Minister Anthony Roberts]
At present NBC say it will put only a limited number of LCSs in the LSPS, due to space considerations. It is possible to create detailed LCSs in a separate document which can then be referred to in the LEP.
at 5:55 pm
Most of the residents do not want the B Line terminated at Newport
This idea was abandon previously
I do not support b line to Newport
at 6:03 pm
B-Line Bus Service failure.
Im annoyed at the way the NSW State Govt has prided itself on the implementation of the B-Line bus service as some kind of amazing service hub that has transformed the way we travel to the city. Is that it? In some ways it has shown its effectiveness by re-introducing double decker buses but in real terms it is simply just a copy of what we already had. “The L90”. What they have actually done is destroy local communities by ram roading a red 24hr B-Line road through the local shopping strips along the northern beaches route. They have removed local parking for local residents where they can stop and shop, Narrabeen being a classic example of this where you once were able to stop and casually shop in peace. Now with the B-Line it is a red road freeway 24/7. Can you imagine if they had their way with Collaroy Beach shopping strip?
A community dead zone!!
I believe that people need their local communities so much more than they need their bus service to work. If you think work is more important then you need to get out more, Get your priorities right!! Politicians have no idea what they are doing!! They are just believing their own political BS.
Think local, shop local and tell these people to start understanding that local communities don’t want a high speed railroad through their shopping centres. The “L-90” Was Community.
at 6:47 pm
B line to Newport is a ridiculous idea. The high density city workers are further south. There are no queues for buses in Newport. Why ruin our village and our beach by extending it. We already struggle to sustain our local businesses, we do not need a red bus lane and a turning circle at our beach. It makes a mockery of the local council consulting with our community to rejuvenate and reenergise our local area.
at 7:22 am
The B-line
I have been a public transport person for 30 years. I live in Newport and have travelled to the city for work for years.I have generally loved the service offered . The “E” and “L90 buses were fine. Did we need the B-line?. I had thought our service was fine.
However bringing in the B-line has again improved the trip to the city. Bus lanes work well and travel time has been cut again.
I DO NOT need a B-line to Newport. I Keoride to Mona Vale or still do the E buses or L90 from Newport.
We have a large traffic flow through Newport. To have the B-line terminate here in Newport would slow down the Avalon/Palm Beach traffic flow.
I have asked the politicians/councillors to try driving to Palm Beach in peak hour or weekends. If buses were coming in to Newport every 10 minutes and turning at a round-about it would create chaos.
Mona Vale B-line is working. Keorides need to be increased as they are now busy. People just need to be organised. If people choose to live here and work in the city or shop at the Mall, then they need factor connections in to their day.
at 10:50 am
G’day all, retail in Newport is struggling enough, putting permanent Bus lanes north and south, kiss retail goodbye. Please remind me why today’s modern double deckers can’t go round the bends. Bring back the old green double deckers cause they could, then they could U turn at Palmy or Av. Politicians seem to have short memories. May I suggest next election we remind them
at 12:41 pm
Pittwater area is a truly a beautiful area and must be retained for future generations.
Spot rezoning is a dangerous move. Once a spot is rezoned others follow suit. Council should show that it is unequivocally against this move.
The forecast expansion of Marinas must insure that there is no extra increase in overcrowding and loss of navigational space.
The existing character of the Newport locality must be retained and incorporated in the updated LEP so that future generations will be able to enjoy the beautiful area.
I was amazed to see that there is a proposal to extend the B Line Service to Newport. There are so many reasons that this proposal would impact adversely on Newport and the majority of Newport residents have shown their objections through letters, petitions, demonstrations and meetings. This is definitely not what residents want and should be withdrawn from the “Towards 2040” document
at 4:37 pm
When will these ‘planning bureaucrats’ learn we do NOT want the B-line extended to Newport for all the reasons commented on above plus the very strong opposition demonstrated previously.
I like the B-line as it is. It works! It doesn’t need ‘improvement.
at 10:02 pm
Totally opposed to both the extension of the B-Line to Newport and spot rezoning. The majority of Newport residents have already expressed their opposition to any extension of he B-Line.
The majority of Northern Beaches residents have already had the opportunity to express their thoughts in relation to the current zoning of land throughout the penninsula as a result of the exhaustive consultation process undertaken by Council at the time.
Why either of these matters are being considered by Council when the opinion of its residents have already been made known is ludicrous.